Fultz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark Fultz
Defendant: RHP Hospitality GT, LP, Marriott Hotel Services Inc and RHP Hospitality GT LP
Case Number: 3:2020cv03367
Filed: November 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2020 Case copied to 4:20-cv-1304-P; Fultz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.. Transfer to Fort Worth Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (cea)
December 4, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal ONLY as to Defendant RHP Hospitality GT, LP filed by Mark Fultz re: #9 Amended Complaint. (Fuller, Lawrence)
December 4, 2020 Filing 9 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against RHP Hospitality GT LP, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. filed by Mark Fultz. Summons(es) not requested at this time. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Request from defense counsel to amend Complaint) (Fuller, Lawrence) Modified text on 12/4/2020 (axm).
November 28, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to RHP Hospitality GT LP; served on 11/18/2020. (Fuller, Lawrence)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in the Fort Worth Division. The Court GRANTS LEAVE to the parties to file briefing stating their objections, if any, by 11/26/2020. In the meantime, the Court ORDERS plaintiff's counsel-of-record to appoint local counsel, in accordance with Local Rule 83.10, by 11/26/2020. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 11/12/2020) (ykp)
November 12, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nayeem Nur Mohammed on behalf of Mark Fultz. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Mohammed, Nayeem)
November 12, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to RHP Hospitality GT LP. (mla)
November 11, 2020 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla)
November 11, 2020 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against RHP Hospitality GT, LP filed by Mark Fultz. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Fuller, Lawrence)
November 11, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mark Fultz. (Fuller, Lawrence)
November 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RHP Hospitality GT, LP filed by Mark Fultz. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11347750) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Fuller, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fultz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Fultz
Represented By: Lawrence A Fuller
Represented By: Nayeem Nur Mohammed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RHP Hospitality GT, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marriott Hotel Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RHP Hospitality GT LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?