Morris v. Miller
| Marti Morris |
| Christopher C Miller |
| 3:2020cv03527 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in District of Columbia as case number 1:20-cv-3578. (axm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Dec 7 10:36:39 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to District of Columbia; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in District of Columbia. (oyh) |
Filing 6
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to District of Columbia. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/4/2020) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Dec 2 11:01:04 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver. (jmg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marti Morris ***FILED USING EMERGENCY FILING EMAIL*** (cea) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Marti Morris. ***FILED USING EMERGENCY FILING EMAIL*** (cea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher C Miller filed by Marti Morris. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. ***FILED USING EMERGENCY FILING EMAIL***(Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits) (cea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morris v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marti Morris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher C Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
