Morales v. Hill et al
| Samuel Amezquita Morales |
| Kevin Louis Hill, Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd. and Ashley Distribution Services Ltd |
| 3:2020cv03580 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Initial Disclosures filed by Ashley Distribution Services Ltd, Kevin Louis Hill. (Scudder, Mark) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures filed by Samuel Amezquita Morales (Smith, Mattilyn) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for three-week docket beginning 2/1/2022 before Judge Ada Brown. Joinder of Parties due by 3/26/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 3/26/2021. Motions due by 11/1/2021. Discovery due by 10/1/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 11/12/2021. Pretrial Order due by 1/3/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 1/3/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/31/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Ada Brown. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 12/29/2020) (mjr)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Samuel Amezquita Morales (Smith, Mattilyn) Modified event text on 12/29/2020 (axm). |
| Filing 6 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Ashley Distribution Services Ltd, Kevin Louis Hill. (Scudder, Mark) |
|
Filing 5
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the FRCvP, lead counsel are directed to meet and confer for the purpose of submitting a Joint Status Report as follows. (Joint Status Report Due Three (3) Weeks from the Date of this Order) (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 12/8/2020) (twd)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ashley Distribution Services Ltd, Kevin Louis Hill identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Ashley Distribution Services Holdings, Inc for Ashley Distribution Services Ltd. (Scudder, Mark) Modified text on 12/9/2020 (jmg). |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd., Kevin Louis Hill. (Scudder, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Kevin Louis Hill, Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11417121) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Scudder, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
