Jones v. Lewis et al
| Kevin Jerome Jones |
| B Lewis |
| 3:2020cv03593 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Dec 9 09:22:55 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Eastern District of Texas as case number 9:20-cv-242. (jmg) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF SEVERANCE AND TRANSFER: Plaintiffs claims against Warden B. Lewis are hereby SEVERED from the claims against the Wynn defendants in this lawsuit and TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Plaintiffs remaining claims against the Wynn officials in this lawsuit are TRANSFERRED to the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/8/2020) 3:20-cv-3593 (svc) Modified on 12/9/2020 (svc).
|
| Interdistrict Transfer to Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. (svc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Dec 7 14:33:08 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against R Boyd, P Colemon, B Lewis, R Moull, J Rodriguez filed by Kevin Jerome Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Lewis et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: B Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
