Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. Estee Lauder Inc
Plaintiff: Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Defendant: Estee Lauder Inc
Case Number: 3:2020cv03627
Filed: December 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay. Dismissal papers due by 2/27/2021. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/28/2021) (hml)
January 27, 2021 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement filed by Estee Lauder Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McNabnay, Neil)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. The above-referenced matter is transferred to the docket of the Honorable Chief Judge Barbara Lynn, who has a related case. All future pleadings shall be filed under case number 3:20-CV-3627-M. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/27/2021) (mjr)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/25/2021) (twd)
January 20, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Estee Lauder Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. COUNTERCLAIM against Geographic Location Innovations LLC filed by Estee Lauder Inc (McNabnay, Neil)
January 20, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Estee Lauder Inc. (McNabnay, Neil)
January 20, 2021 Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Estee Lauder Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Neil J McNabnay added to party Estee Lauder Inc(pty:dft) (McNabnay, Neil)
December 11, 2020 Filing 7 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (axm)
December 11, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Estee Lauder Inc. (axm)
December 11, 2020 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm)
December 11, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geographic Location Innovations LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Patent Asset Management, LLC for Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Johnson, Jay)
December 11, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Johnson, Jay)
December 11, 2020 Filing 2 ***PLEASE DISREGARD PER ATTORNEY, WILL REFILE*** CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geographic Location Innovations LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Patent Asset Management, LLC for Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Johnson, Jay) Modified on 12/11/2020 (ndt).
December 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Estee Lauder, Inc. filed by Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11434012) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A) (Johnson, Jay) Modified text on 12/11/2020 (axm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. Estee Lauder Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estee Lauder Inc
Represented By: Rodeen Talebi
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Sarika Naresh Patel
Represented By: Ricardo Joel Bonilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Represented By: D Bradley Kizzia
Represented By: Jay B Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?