Hoya Corporation et al v. Alcon Inc et al
Plaintiff: Hoya Corporation and Hoya Surgical Optics Inc
Defendant: Alcon Inc, Alcon Laboratories Inc and Alcon Research LLC
Case Number: 3:2020cv03629
Filed: December 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Extend Time For Defendants to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint [ECF No. #7 ]. The Motion is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants have until 2/19/2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/13/2021) (ctf)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Hoya Corporation, Hoya Surgical Optics Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stevenson, Theodore)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Alcon Research LLC. Waiver sent on 12/11/2020. (Stevenson, Theodore)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Alcon Laboratories Inc. Waiver sent on 12/11/2020. (Stevenson, Theodore)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Alcon Inc. Waiver sent on 12/11/2020. (Stevenson, Theodore)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mjr) (Main Document 3 corrected and replaced on 12/15/2020) (mjr).
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Hoya Corporation, Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11434330) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Cover Sheet, #8 Certificate of Interested Persons, #9 USPTO Report AO120) (Stevenson, Theodore)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hoya Corporation, Hoya Surgical Optics Inc. (See document #1 -8 for image) (axm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoya Corporation et al v. Alcon Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hoya Corporation
Represented By: Lauren L Fornarotto
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Represented By: Geoffrey L Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hoya Surgical Optics Inc
Represented By: Lauren L Fornarotto
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Represented By: Geoffrey L Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alcon Inc
Represented By: Gregg F LoCascio
Represented By: Jeanne M Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alcon Laboratories Inc
Represented By: Gregg F LoCascio
Represented By: Jeanne M Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alcon Research LLC
Represented By: Gregg F LoCascio
Represented By: Jeanne M Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?