Moser et al v. Cogburn et al
| Jonathan Gonzalez and Richard W Moser |
| John H Rexford, James G Reynolds, Exela Technologies Inc, Par Chadha, Martin Akins and Ronald Cogburn |
| 3:2020cv03691 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Contract: Stockholders' Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION: Member case(s) 3:20-cv-3691-D consolidated with lead case 3:20-cv-1800. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:20-cv-1800. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/27/2021) (mjr) Modified on 1/27/2021 (mjr).
|
| Filing 6 ADVISORY TO COUNSEL: Please submit your proposed order for the following motion -- in modifiable Word or WordPerfect format -- to Fitzwater_Orders@txnd.uscourts.gov.: #4 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Case filed by Martin Akins, Par Chadha, Ronald Cogburn, Exela Technologies Inc, John H Rexford, James G Reynolds Attorney Peter A Stokes added to party Martin Akins, Par Chadha, Ronald Cogburn, Exela Technologies Inc, John H Rexford, James G Reynolds(Senior Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The court DENIES #4 Motion to consolidate the two actions, however, this case is hereby transferred to the docket of the Honorable Senior United States District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater for possible consolidation with Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-1800-D. Judge Sam A. Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/25/2021) (svc)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Case filed by Martin Akins, Par Chadha, Ronald Cogburn, Exela Technologies Inc, John H Rexford, James G Reynolds Attorney Peter A Stokes added to party Martin Akins, Par Chadha, Ronald Cogburn, Exela Technologies Inc, John H Rexford, James G Reynolds(pty:dft). (Stokes, Peter) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jonathan Gonzalez, Richard W Moser. (Bradley, Balon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Jonathan Gonzalez, Richard W Moser. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11460230) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) Verification, #2 Affidavit(s) Verification) (Bradley, Balon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
