Tunnel IP LLC v. Edifier USA LLC
| Tunnel IP LLC |
| Edifier USA, LLC and Edifier USA LLC |
| 3:2020cv03720 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead [ECF No. #10 ], to which Plaintiff is unopposed [ECF No. #11 ]. The Motion is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond is 4/1/2021. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/29/2021) (ctf)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Unopposition re: #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Tunnel IP LLC (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Edifier USA LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension)Attorney Richard L Schwartz added to party Edifier USA LLC(pty:dft) (Schwartz, Richard) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Edifier USA LLC; served on 1/8/2021. (Ni, Hao) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Howard L Wernow. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/4/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-11472432) filed by Tunnel IP LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)Attorney Howard L Wernow added to party Tunnel IP LLC(pty:pla) (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (axm) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Edifier USA LLC. (axm) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Report on Filing Patent/Trademark (AO120) filed by Tunnel IP LLC (Ni, Hao) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tunnel IP LLC. (Ni, Hao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Edifier USA, LLC filed by Tunnel IP LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11466921) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet) (Ni, Hao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
