Taylor v. The Kendall Law Group PLLC et al
| Theodore William Taylor |
| The Kendall Law Group PLLC and Joseph Kendall |
| 3:2021cv00065 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| David L Horan |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/8/2021) (mjr)
|
|
Filing 8
Order Adopting #4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/8/2021) (mjr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9. Mon Mar 8 16:55:16 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Reply Brief to #6 Supplemental Findings and Recommendations filed by Theodore William Taylor. (jmg) |
|
Filing 6
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: For the reasons above and for the reasons set out in the Initial FCR, the Court should deny the construed motion for leave to amend and dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A copy of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/11/2021) (ndt) Modified on 2/18/2021 (mcrd).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Feb 11 16:23:02 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Formal Response to #4 Findings and Recommendations by Theodore William Taylor. (jmg) |
|
Filing 4
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case. The Court should dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/15/2021) (jmg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Jan 15 14:38:45 CST 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Jan 14 16:19:27 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Joseph Kendall, The Kendall Law Group PLLC filed by Theodore William Taylor. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (hml) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (hml) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
