Dingler v. State of Texas
| Joseph Kelly Dingler |
| State of Texas |
| Rockwall County Sheriff |
| 3:2021cv00097 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 COURTESY COPY OF FIFTH CIRCUIT FILINGS - Proposed MOTION for More Definite Statement Free Access To Justice, (Document Restricted) First MOTION to Withdraw Funds from Court Registry () filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler (Dingler, Joseph) Modified on 3/3/2021 (cea). |
| Filing 12 COURTESY COPY OF FIFTH CIRCUIT FILINGS - Emergency MOTION to Stay re #10 Judgment filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s) March 4th injury) (Dingler, Joseph) Modified on 3/3/2021 (cea). |
| USCA Case Number 21-10155 in USCA5 for #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. (svc) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #3 Order,,, #10 Judgment, #6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel to the Fifth Circuit by Joseph Kelly Dingler. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (Dingler, Joseph) |
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: This case is REMANDED to the County Court at Law Number Two of Rockwall County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/19/2021) (svc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/19/2021: #1 remand letter) (svc).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: #7 Findings and Conclusions of theMagistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/19/2021) (svc)
|
| Filing 8 OBJECTION to #7 Findings, Conclusions of the Magistrate filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler (Dingler, Joseph) Modified text and linkage on 2/3/2021 (jmg). |
|
Filing 7
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the #4 Emergency Notice of Removal. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, this case should be REMANDED to the state court sua sponte. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/20/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying the plaintiff's #5 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/19/2021) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler (Dingler, Joseph) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Motion for Leave to File Emergency Notice of Removal. Because the parties, claims, and facts, underlying the two proposed new actions are unrelated to the claims that the plaintiff asserts in this lawsuit, they are properly construed as new civil actions, and the motion to consolidate them into this case is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to unfile the notice of removal (doc. 12 ) in this case, open a new civil case for the attachments to the motion to consolidate (doc. 11 ), open a separate new civil case for the notice of removal (doc. 12 ), file a copy of this order in each new case, and directly assign both new cases to District Judge Jane J. Boyle and Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (Originally filed in case 3:19-cv-2635-B as document #13) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/14/2021) (oyh) Modified docket text on 1/14/2021 (oyh).
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (oyh) |
| Filing 1 *** DISREGARD AS ERROR*** New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) Modified docket text on 1/14/2021 (oyh). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
