Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC v. RAB Lighting, Inc.
Plaintiff: Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC and Heavy Duty Lighting LLC
Defendant: RAB Lighting, Inc. and RAB Lighting Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv00128
Filed: January 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Referring Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond. RAB Lighting Inc answer or responses due 4/5/2021. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/18/2021) (chmb)
February 18, 2021 Filing 12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by RAB Lighting Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Lucas C Wohlford added to party RAB Lighting Inc(pty:dft) (Wohlford, Lucas)
January 28, 2021 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to RAB Lighting Inc. (mjr)
January 28, 2021 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Heavy Duty Lighting LLC. (Moore, Stevenson)
January 21, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stevenson Moore, V on behalf of Heavy Duty Lighting LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Moore, Stevenson)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, plaintiff Heavy Duty Lighting, LLX, shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/20/2021) (chmb)
January 20, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to RAB Lighting Inc. (ndt)
January 20, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of AO 120 Form - Report on Filing re: #1 Complaint filed by Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC (Schmidt, Henning) Modified on 1/20/2021 (ndt).
January 20, 2021 Judge Ed Kinkeade reassigned as presiding judge per Special Order 3-287. Judge Brantley Starr no longer assigned to the case. (ctf)
January 19, 2021 Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (ndt)
January 19, 2021 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
January 19, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC. (Schmidt, Henning)
January 19, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC. (Schmidt, Henning)
January 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against RAB Lighting, Inc. filed by Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11529479) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E, #7 Exhibit(s) F, #8 Exhibit(s) G, #9 Exhibit(s) H, #10 Exhibit(s) I, #11 Exhibit(s) J, #12 Exhibit(s) K, #13 Exhibit(s) L, #14 Exhibit(s) M, #15 Exhibit(s) N, #16 Exhibit(s) O) (Schmidt, Henning)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC v. RAB Lighting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAB Lighting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAB Lighting Inc
Represented By: Lucas C Wohlford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heavy Duty Lighting, LLC
Represented By: Henning Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heavy Duty Lighting LLC
Represented By: Henning Schmidt
Represented By: Stevenson Moore, V
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?