Flores v. Geiser et al
Plaintiff: Felix Andre Flores
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Albert F Geiser and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv00241
Filed: February 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kenneth Patrick Babb on behalf of Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Babb, Kenneth)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for three-week docket beginning 1/24/2022 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. Joinder of Parties due by 6/1/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 8/2/2021. Motions due by 9/24/2021. Discovery due by 10/1/2021. Settlement Status Report due by 8/2/2021. Pretrial Order due by 1/3/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 1/3/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2022 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 3/11/2021) (mjr)
March 3, 2021 Filing 7 Joint Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order and Status Report filed by Albert F Geiser. (Knight, Katherine) Modified text on 3/4/2021 (jmg).
March 3, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charles E Soechting, Jr on behalf of Felix Andre Flores. (Filer will update contact info in ECF.) (Soechting, Charles)
February 16, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. (Babb, Kenneth)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/3/2021. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/10/2021) (jmg)
February 3, 2021 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr)
February 3, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Albert F Geiser. (Knight, Katherine)
February 3, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Albert F Geiser. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11577477) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Index of State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit(s) 1A - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit(s) 1B - Letter to Request Citation, #4 Exhibit(s) 1C Letter to Request Citation, #5 Exhibit(s) 1DCitation Issued to Geiser, #6 Exhibit(s) 1E - Citation Issued to Walgreens, #7 Exhibit(s) 1F - Geiser & Walgreens Original Answer, #8 Exhibit(s) 1G - Geiser & Walgreens RFD to Pltf, #9 Exhibit(s) 1H - Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel, #10 Exhibit(s) 1I - Proposed Order, #11 Exhibit(s) 1J - Order Granting Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel, #12 Exhibit(s) 2 - State Court Docket, #13 Declaration(s) 3 - Declaration of Geiser, #14 Exhibit(s) 4 - Notice of Service on Walgreens, #15 Declaration(s) 4 - Declaration of Joseph B. Amsbary, Jr., #16 Exhibit(s) 6 - Walgreens' Consent to Removal, #17 Exhibit(s) 7 - Walgreens' Certificate of Incorporation, #18 Cover Sheet, #19 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Knight, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Geiser et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felix Andre Flores
Represented By: Charles E Soechting, Jr
Represented By: Chad Austin West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Represented By: Mark A Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert F Geiser
Represented By: Katherine Knight
Represented By: Davinder Jassal
Represented By: Vic H Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
Represented By: Mark A Goodman
Represented By: Kenneth Patrick Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?