Siyavir LLC v. AmGUARD Insurance Company et al
| Siyavir LLC |
| Jeff Prater and AmGUARD Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv00410 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Taylor F Brinkman on behalf of AmGUARD Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Brinkman, Taylor) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by AmGUARD Insurance Company re: #8 Opposed MOTION to Remand. (Kidwell, Susan) Modified text on 4/19/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 9 Notice of Correction of Signature re: #8 Motion to Remand filed by Siyavir LLC. (Flores, Marco) Modified text on 3/29/2021 (jmg). |
| Filing 8 Opposed MOTION to Remand filed by Siyavir LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B) (Flores, Marco) Modified text on 3/29/2021 (jmg). |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Siyavir LLC. (Flores, Marco) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marco Dax Flores for Kyle Shortall on behalf of Siyavir LLC. (Flores, Marco) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Haley Mowdy Owen on behalf of AmGUARD Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Owen, Haley) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, plaintiff Siyavir, LLC, shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/26/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AmGUARD Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for AmGUARD Insurance Company. (Kidwell, Susan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by AmGUARD Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11640011) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Exhibit(s) K, #12 Exhibit(s) L) (Kidwell, Susan) Modified jury demand on 2/26/2021 (axm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
