Bekendam v. Bekendam et al
| Stephanie Bekendam |
| Christine Harmon, Kimberly Gray, Donna Green, Danny Tucker, FBI Dwyer Corp, Madeline Stevens, Angie Chavez, Ashley Dwyer-Dack, Wendy NLN, Lora Lee Kelly, Dwyer Gray Corporation, Tamara Thornton, Cornelius Hardemon, Rachel Wilson-Green, Maxx Green, Larry Wayne Bekendam and Summer Walsh |
| 3:2021cv00575 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Mail returned as undeliverable. #8 Findings and Recommendations on Case received back from Stephanie Bekendam as Return to Sender - Attempted Not Known - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (jmg) |
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case re: #3 Complaint. The Court should dismiss Bekendam's complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 4/23/2021) (mjr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Apr 23 15:56:21 CDT 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 7
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Stephanie Bekendam must address the following deficiencies: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), The $402 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 4/14/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 3/15/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP Form, #2 Rule 8 Procedure, #3 Complaint) (hml)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Mar 15 16:46:18 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Mar 12 14:42:09 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Larry Wayne Bekendam, Angie Chavez, Dwyer Gray Corporation, Ashley Dwyer-Dack, FBI Dwyer Corp, Kimberly Gray, Donna Green, Maxx Green, Cornelius Hardemon, Christine Harmon, Lora Lee Kelly, Wendy NLN, Madeline Stevens, Tamara Thornton, Danny Tucker, Summer Walsh filed by Stephanie Bekendam. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mjr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
