Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. Relax the Back Corporation
Geographic Location Innovations LLC |
Relax the Back Corporation |
3:2021cv00623 |
March 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ada Brown |
David C Godbey |
Property Rights: Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Relax the Back Corporation; served on 3/23/2021. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Relax the Back Corporation. (hml) |
Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (hml) |
Judge David C Godbey reassigned as presiding judge per Special Order 3-287. Judge Ada Brown no longer assigned to the case. (ctf) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hml) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geographic Location Innovations LLC identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Patent Asset Management, LLC for Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Johnson, Jay) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Relax the Back Corporation filed by Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11709142) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A) (Johnson, Jay) Modified text on 3/19/2021 (hml). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. Relax the Back Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Geographic Location Innovations LLC | |
Represented By: | Jay B Johnson |
Represented By: | D Bradley Kizzia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Relax the Back Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.