Salgado v. USA
Petitioner: Freddie Steve Salgado
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2021cv00689
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Fri Apr 30 10:36:40 CDT 2021 (crt)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Amend 2255 Motion. His 2255 Motion is supplemented with the additional claims asserted in his motion for leave to amend. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 4/29/2021) (ndt)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended 2255 Motion filed by Freddie Steve Salgado. (oyh)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Ryan Patrick Niedermair-DOJ added as AUSA. (Niedermair-DOJ, Ryan)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Apr 20 10:52:42 CDT 2021 (crt)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Leigha A Simonton-DOJ for USA added. The Governments response is due by June 18, 2021. Deadline to reply to the response is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 4/19/2021) (chmb)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3 and NEF of document 4 remailed to Beaumont at PO Box 26040 Fri Apr 9 10:40:52 CDT 2021 (crt)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Mail returned as undeliverable. #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Freddie Steve Salgado as Refused. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (mjr)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. NEF of document 4 Fri Mar 26 12:08:56 CDT 2021 (crt)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases. It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Respondent is ordered to file a response or until further order of the court, (4) no amendments or supplements to the habeas corpus petition shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the habeas petition must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended petition on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Movant must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/25/2021) (chmb)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. re-mailed Thu Mar 25 10:44:01 CDT 2021 (crt)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Mar 24 16:14:14 CDT 2021 (crt)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Freddie Steve Salgado re #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (jmg)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:17-CR-112-L (03)) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (jmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salgado v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Leigha A Simonton-DOJ
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Niedermair-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Freddie Steve Salgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?