May v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
| Dr. Ruth C May and Dr Ruth C May |
| United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv00718 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Labor: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 9/1/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 9/1/2021. Motions due by 5/2/2022. Discovery due by 8/15/2022. Trial set for 9/6/2022 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Sam R Cummings. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 5/3/2021) (oyh) Modified discovery due date on 5/4/2021 (jmg).
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company for United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Wendy Lynn Furman added to party United of Omaha Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Furman, Wendy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United of Omaha Life Insurance Company; served on 4/2/2021. (mjr) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (ndt) |
| Filing 4 *** DISREGARD DUPLICATE ENTRY*** New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) Modified on 3/30/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ruth C May. (Clouse, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ruth C May. (Receipt number 0539-11742689; Filing Fee $402.) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Clouse, Keith) Modified payment information on 3/30/2021 (mjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
