Oyekwe v. Research Now Group Inc et al
| McDavid Oyekwe and McDavid O Oyekwe |
| Research Now Group Inc doing business as Dynata and Seyfarth Shaw |
| 3:2021cv00886 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. § 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #23 Judgment, to the Fifth Circuit by McDavid O Oyekwe. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. ***FILED USING EMERGENCY EMAIL*** (twd) |
Filing 23
JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and all pending motions are TERMINATED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/2/2021) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 22
Order Accepting #16 Findings and Recommendations. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/2/2021) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER denying #18 Motion for Recusal. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/2/2021) (oyh)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Research Now Group Inc re: #16 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Cleveland, Joseph) Modified document linkage and text on 6/2/2021 (ykp). |
| Filing 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment against Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw filed by McDavid O Oyekwe. ***FILED USING EMERGENCY EMAIL*** (cea) |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse Karen Gren Scholer & David L Horan filed by McDavid O Oyekwe (submitted via the emergency filing account) (lrl) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE/OBJECTION/Appeal to #16 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION and MOTION for Default Judgment and Neutral Magistrate filed by McDavid O Oyekwe ***FILED USING EMERGENCY EMAIL*** (twd) |
|
Filing 16
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #1 Notice of Removal. The Court should dismiss this case with prejudice, terminating all pending motions (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/12/2021) (oyh)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Default Judgment against Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw filed by McDavid Oyekwe with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (oyh) |
| Filing 14 (AMENDED) COMPLAINT against Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw filed by McDavid Oyekwe. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by McDavid Oyekwe. (jmg) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE/OBJECTION/Appeal to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition & MOTION for Trial & Neutral Magistrate filed by McDavid Oyekwe. (jmg) Set pending motion on 5/19/2021 per Plaintiff's status inquiry (lrl). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING #7 MOTION FOR EXTENSION AS MOOT, #6 VACATING PRIOR ORDER, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE:Responses due by 5/27/2021. Replies due by 6/11/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/27/2021) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Apr 27 16:39:59 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 10 Appendix in Support filed by Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw re #9 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s), #9 Exhibit(s), #10 Exhibit(s), #11 Exhibit(s)) (Cleveland, Joseph) Modified text and linkage on 4/27/2021 (jmg). |
| Filing 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition (Cleveland, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition filed by Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw (Cleveland, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Petition filed by Research Now Group Inc, Seyfarth Shaw (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cleveland, Joseph) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Wed Apr 21 12:08:12 CDT 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
*** VACATED PER #11 ORDER*** ORDER REQUIRING RULE 26(f) REPORT : Rule 26(f) Conference. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants must confer over the telephone or through videoconferencing not later than May 11, 2021. Defendants' counsel is responsible for initiating this Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/20/2021) (ndt) Modified docket text on 4/27/2021 (oyh).
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY AND OTHER NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/20/2021) (ndt)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Research Now Group, Inc. a/k/a Dynata, Seyfarth Shaw. (Cleveland, Joseph) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/19/2021) (axm). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Seyfarth Shaw, Research Now Group, Inc. a/k/a Dynata. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11809930) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Cover Sheet, #9 Cover Sheet Supplement, #10 Notice of Related Pages) (Cleveland, Joseph) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Mon Apr 19 17:37:00 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
