Hunnicutt v. Mnuchin et al
| Charles Larry Hunnicutt |
| Charles Rettig, United States of America, U.S. Internal Revenue Service and Steven Mnuchin |
| 3:2021cv01302 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Jul 6 09:24:41 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Before the Court is the plaintiff's Motion for Order to the Withdrawal and Cancellation of Any, and All Court Orders, received 7/1/2021 (doc. #8 ). Because the plaintiff's motion seeks dismissal of his case, it is liberally construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with the required certificate of inmate trust account, received 6/24/2021 (doc. #5 ) is DEEMED MOOT. The Clerk of Court shall terminate the motion for order and this action based on the notice of dismissal. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/2/2021) (jmg)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order to the Withdrawal and Cancellation of Any and All Court Orders filed by Charles Larry Hunnicutt. (mjr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: the plaintiff's #5 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The plaintiff shall pay the required $402.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days from the date of this order. If he fails to do so, denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be recommended, and this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/28/2021) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Jun 28 14:37:55 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 6 (AMENDED)Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Charles Larry Hunnicutt. (ygl) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Charles Larry Hunnicutt. (ygl) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Charles Larry Hunnicutt must address the following deficiency: pay the $402 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/8/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (jmg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Jun 8 11:46:15 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Charles Larry Hunnicutt. (axm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Jun 7 18:35:57 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
