Isom v. 7-Eleven INC
Plaintiff: Tyesha D Isom and Tyesha N Isom
Defendant: 7-Eleven Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv01348
Filed: June 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Prop: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 First Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire sent to TYESHA N. ISOM. Deadline to respond to the questionnaire is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/11/2021) (mcrd)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting the #5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/11/2021) (mcrd)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Fri Jun 11 13:23:37 CDT 2021 (crt)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Jun 11 08:30:29 CDT 2021 (crt)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tyesha N Isom. (ygl)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tyesha N Isom. (ygl)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against 7-Eleven Inc filed by Tyesha N Isom. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ygl)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ygl)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isom v. 7-Eleven INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 7-Eleven Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyesha D Isom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyesha N Isom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?