Spence v. Unidentified Clements Unit Officer
| James C Spence |
| Unidentified Clements Unit Officer |
| 3:2021cv01407 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case copied to 2:21-cv-137-Z. Transfer to Amarillo Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (cea) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Jun 22 08:42:50 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: Insofar as Plaintiff James C. Spence appears to bring a civil rights case related to events alleged to have occurred at the Clements Unit, a prison located in Potter County, which lies within the Amarillo Division of this district, see 28 U.S.C. 124(a)(5), this action will be transferred to that division of this judicial district under Section 1391 (b) and the undersigned's authority granted by Rule 2(a)(3) of the Court's Miscellaneous Order No. 6 on 7/12/2021 to allow any party to file an objection to Judge Brown within 14 days after being served with a copy of this order, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a). If an objection is filed, the order of transfer is stayed pending further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/21/2021) (twd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Jun 17 09:28:36 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Unidentified Clements Unit Officer filed by James C Spence. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mla) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spence v. Unidentified Clements Unit Officer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unidentified Clements Unit Officer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James C Spence | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
