Pham et al v. Richardson et al
| Phuc T Pham, T- T- P- and Ly G Gian |
| Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas and Gregory A Richardson |
| 3:2021cv01414 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Proof of Service on Defendants. (Shah, Sunny) Modified text on 7/1/2021 (jmg). |
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sunny Shah. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 6/21/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 10 Summons issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Gregory A Richardson, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ygl) |
| Filing 9 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) |
| Filing 8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-11984867) filed by Ly G. Gian, T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Attorney Sunny Shah added to party Ly G. Gian(pty:pla), Attorney Sunny Shah added to party T- T- P-(pty:pla), Attorney Sunny Shah added to party Phuc T. Pham(pty:pla) (Shah, Sunny) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by T- T- P-, Phuc T. Pham. (Rodriguez, George) (Main Document 2 replaced with a flattened PDF on 6/17/2021) (ygl). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Phuc T. Pham, T- T- P-. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11984730)Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s), #9 Exhibit(s), #10 Cover Sheet) (Rodriguez, George) Modified text on 6/17/2021 (ygl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
