Sanchez v. McCormick Trucking Inc. et al
| Gabriel Sanchez |
| McCormick Trucking Inc, Jose Rodriguez and Jennifer Gonzales |
| 3:2021cv01471 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/27/2021) (jmg)
|
|
Filing 9
Order Adopting #8 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. The Court construes Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss as a notice of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and ORDERS that this civil action be dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/27/2021) (jmg)
|
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should construe Sanchez's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #7 ) as a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) (A)(i) and DISMISS this action without prejudice. Additionally, the Court should direct the Clerk of Court to terminate Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion (ECF No. #3 ) as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 7/8/2021) (axm)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gabriel Sanchez. (jmg)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gabriel Sanchez. (jmg)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford. (jmg)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jennifer Gonzales, McCormick Trucking Inc., Jose Rodriguez with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Moore, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jennifer Gonzales, McCormick Trucking Inc., Jose Rodriguez. (Moore, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by McCormick Trucking Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11996231) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Index of State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit(s) B - State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit(s) C - State Court Documets, #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Moore, Kimberly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
