Coleman v. Combs et al
| Veletta Coleman |
| Todd Combs, Warren Buffett, Sarah-Renee Hollingsworth Garner, Spencer Browne, Law Office of Reyes, Browne and Reilly, C Marsh and City of Dallas |
| 3:2021cv01493 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 ORDER: Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to appoint counsel, #10 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #11 Judgment to the Fifth Circuit by Veletta Coleman. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (jmg) Modified linkage and docket text on 8/18/2021 (ajb). |
Filing 11
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is WARNED that if she persists in filing frivolous, baseless or duplicative actions, or actions over which the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the Court may impose monetary sanctions and/or bar her from bringing any further action. The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 8/2/2021) (mjr)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ACCEPTING #8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 8/2/2021) (mjr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 5, and to appoint counsel, Doc. 6, are TERMINATED AS MOOT. Should the district judge decline to accept the recommendation of the magistrate judge, Plaintiff may re-urge her motions. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/15/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Coleman's complaint should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Further, Coleman should be WARNED that if she persists in filing frivolous, baseless or duplicative actions, or actions over which the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the Court may impose monetary sanctions and/or bar her from filing any further civil actions. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/15/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/30/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Veletta Coleman. (ndt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Veletta Coleman. (ndt) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Veletta Coleman. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Warren Buffett, Todd Combs filed by Veletta Coleman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
