Choice Exploration Inc et al v. Gemini Insurance Company et al
| Petrodome Energy LLC, Petrodome Liberty LLC and Choice Exploration Inc |
| Gemini Insurance Company, Berkley Oil & Gas Specialty Services, LLC and Suzanne Roberts |
| 3:2021cv01519 |
| June 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Brantley Starr |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 8/23/2021) (chmb) Modified text on 8/24/2021 (jmg).
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Gemini Insurance Company re: #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Taylor, Natasha) |
|
Filing 16
ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Brantley Starr for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/5/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 15 REPLY filed by Gemini Insurance Company re: #6 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division to the Eastern District of Texas (Taylor, Natasha) |
| Filing 14 Appendix in Support filed by Choice Exploration Inc, Petrodome Energy LLC, Petrodome Liberty LLC re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court , #13 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Dennis, Edward) |
| Filing 13 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Choice Exploration Inc, Petrodome Energy LLC, Petrodome Liberty LLC re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Dennis, Edward) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Choice Exploration Inc, Petrodome Energy LLC, Petrodome Liberty LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dennis, Edward) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Choice Exploration Inc, Petrodome Energy LLC, Petrodome Liberty LLC re: #6 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division to the Eastern District of Texas (Dennis, Edward) |
| Filing 9 Amended Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet B, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I) (Taylor, Natasha) Modified text on 7/15/2021 (mjr). |
| Filing 8 ***DISREGARD PER ATTORNEY***AMENDED DOCUMENT by Gemini Insurance Company. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet B, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G) (Taylor, Natasha) Modified on 7/2/2021 (ykp). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Federal courts are vested with subject matter jurisdiction over all civil actions "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States," or where the case in controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states, or between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state. 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a)(1)-(2). The Court orders Defendant Gemini to amend its Notice of Removal to distinctly and affirmatively allege the citizenship of Plaintiff Petrodome Liberty and Plaintiff Petrodome Energy, respectively within twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is signed. Failure to comply with this order will result in immediate remand to state court without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/1/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division to the Eastern District of Texas filed by Gemini Insurance Company with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Taylor, Natasha) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Gemini Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Taylor, Natasha) |
| Filing 4 Court Request for Recusal: Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Judge Ed Kinkeade for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:21-cv-1519-K. (cea) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gemini Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate W.R. Berkley Corporation for Gemini Insurance Company. (Taylor, Natasha) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Gemini Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12017643) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet B, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G) (Taylor, Natasha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
