Patterson v. Thompson et al
| Dralon Duran Patterson |
| Judge Carter Thompson and Dallas County DA |
| 3:2021cv01810 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION filed by Dralon Duran Patterson re: #5 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dralon Duran Patterson. (mjr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Sep 20 13:21:21 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 5
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Patterson's habeas corpus petition should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/19/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See Rule 1(b) and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 habeas cases. The Court will order Respondent to file an answer, if necessary, after screening is complete. It is therefore ORDERED that (1) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (2) all discovery in this case is stayed until Respondent is ordered to file an answer or until further order of the court, (3) no amendments or supplements to the habeas corpus petition shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (4) any motion to amend the habeas petition must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended petition on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/5/2021) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. NEF Thu Aug 5 14:45:09 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dralon Duran Patterson. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number DS132934) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mjr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Aug 4 16:44:07 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
