Hill v. State of Texas
| Andrew Hill |
| State of Texas |
| 3:2021cv01863 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Damaged Phone While E-Filing filed by Andrew Hill. (mjr) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Andrew Hill re: #7 Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire. (mjr) |
Filing 7
MAGISTRATE JUDGES QUESTIONNAIRE sent to Andrew Hill. Deadline to respond to the questionnaire is 14 days of the date of this Questionnaire. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/12/2021) (svc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. No further process shall issue except upon further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/12/2021) (svc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Aug 12 12:43:31 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Aug 12 12:47:38 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Aug 11 09:22:54 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Andrew Hill. (jmg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Andrew Hill. (jmg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against State of Texas filed by Andrew Hill. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. State of Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Texas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
