Setliff v. ZOCCAM Technologies Inc et al
| Reuben Setliff |
| ZOCCAM Technologies Inc, Ashley Cook and Ashley L Cook |
| 3:2021cv02025 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Contract: Stockholders' Suits |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Appendix in Support filed by ZOCCAM Technologies Inc re #14 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Childers, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 14
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by ZOCCAM Technologies Inc re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint (Childers, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by ZOCCAM Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Childers, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 12
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Ashley L Cook re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Aldous, Steven)
|
|
Filing 11
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Ashley L Cook (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aldous, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathaniel Plemons on behalf of ZOCCAM Technologies Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Plemons, Nathaniel)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants' responsive pleadings are now due on or before October 15, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/29/2021) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
Appendix in Support filed by Ashley L Cook, ZOCCAM Technologies Inc re #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Childers, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 7
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Ashley L Cook, ZOCCAM Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Childers, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Ashley Cook, ZOCCAM Technologies Inc. (mjr) (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/27/2021) (mjr).
|
|
Filing 6
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to issue Summons to Defendant Ashley L. Cook filed by Reuben Setliff. (Dodge, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to issue Summons to Defendant Zoccam Technologies, Inc. filed by Reuben Setliff. (Dodge, David)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reuben Setliff. (Dodge, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Ruben Setliff. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12170286) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Dodge, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
