Perkins v. Song et al
| Zachary Perkins |
| Jae Man Song and Sung Ja Song |
| 3:2021cv02041 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Zachary Perkins. (Tharpe, Richard) Modified event text on 10/15/2021 (jmg). |
| Filing 11 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jae Man Song, Sung Ja Song re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Hunt, Richard) |
| Filing 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction () filed by Jae Man Song, Sung Ja Song (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Party Jae Man Song added.Attorney Richard M Hunt added to party Jae Man Song(pty:dft), Attorney Richard M Hunt added to party Sung Ja Song(pty:dft) (Hunt, Richard) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sung Ja Song; served on 9/22/2021. (Tharpe, Richard) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Jae Man Song; served on 9/22/2021. (Tharpe, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Designation of Local Counsel filed by Zachary Perkins. (Tharpe, Richard) Modified linkage and text on 8/30/2021 (mjr). |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, by September 15, 2021, the plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/28/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Jae Man Song, Sung Ja Song. (mjr) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zachary Perkins. (Tharpe, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Zachary Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Tharpe, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Zachary Perkins. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12172695) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Tharpe, Richard) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/27/2021) (mjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
