Hudgens v. USA
| Franklin Lee Hudgens |
| USA |
| 3:2021cv02044 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amy J Mitchell-DOJ added as AUSA. (Mitchell-DOJ, Amy)
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES IN A MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255. The United States Attorney shall file an answer or response to the motion within 60 days of service, answering in substance as required by Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Courts. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Leigha A Simonton-DOJ for USA added. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/7/2021) (ykp)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Sep 7 16:48:07 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: the movant's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form), received on 8/26/2021. No filing fee is required in order to file a 2255 motion. Accordingly, the application to proceed is DEEMED MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/30/2021) (mcrd)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Mon Aug 30 08:55:42 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp)
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Fri Aug 27 11:51:18 CDT 2021 (crt)
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:18-cr-573-B (12)) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp)
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (ykp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hudgens v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Franklin Lee Hudgens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Amy J Mitchell-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.