Hurlall v. Lowes Home Center LLC
| Chandra Hurlall |
| Lowe's Home Center, LLC and Lowes Home Center LLC |
| 3:2021cv02188 |
| September 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal. (chmb) |
| Filing 11 First STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Chandra Hurlall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Taghavi, Tandis) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order filed by Lowes Home Center LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Gant, Robin) |
| Filing 9 (Document Restricted) Under Seal Defendant Lowe's Home Centers LLC (incorrectly named) Attorney Contact Information (Sealed pursuant to SO 19-1, statute, or rule) filed by Lowes Home Center LLC (Gant, Robin) |
| Filing 8 Second Amendment to Notice of Removal against Chandra Hurlall filed by Lowes Home Center LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Gant, Robin) Modified text on 9/21/2021 (mjr). |
Filing 7
ORDER: Federal courts are vested with subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil actions "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States," or where the case in controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states, or between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state. 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a)(1)(2). A federal court has no power to adjudicate claims where subject-matter jurisdiction does not exist and, consequently, must dismiss the action. Defendant is ORDERED to amend its Amended Notice of Removal by Monday, September 27, 2021. Failure to properly establish diversity jurisdiction may result in remand to state court without further notice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/20/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 Amended Notice of Removal by Lowes Home Center LLC. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal. . (Gant, Robin) Modified text on 9/21/2021 (mjr). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Sep 20 15:08:31 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Sep 17 12:19:13 CDT 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Federal courts are vested with subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil actions "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States," or where the case in controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states, or between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state. 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a)(1)(2). Defendant is ORDERED to amend its Notice of Removal by Monday, September 27, 2021. Failure to properly establish diversity jurisdiction may result in remand to state court without further notice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/17/2021) (chmb) Modified on 9/17/2021 (chmb).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This case was removed from State Court on September 14, 2021. Plaintiffs counsel, Tandis Taghavi, is not admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Therefore, within 30 days from the date of this order, counsel for Plaintiff must either become admitted to practice in this District (See LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (See LR 83.9(b)). Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/15/2021) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Sep 15 16:24:19 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Sep 15 10:48:43 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lowe's Home Center, LLC. (Gant, Robin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Lowe's Home Center, LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12218203) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Gant, Robin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
