Battle v. Gravaman Asset Management
| Samuel Battle |
| Gravaman Asset Management |
| 3:2021cv02217 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Brantley Starr |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed on 9/31/2021 as to Gravaman Asset Management filed by Samuel Battle re: #5 Order. (mla) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Because he paid the fee, the plaintiff is now responsible for serving each defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint, the action is subject to dismissal against that defendant without prejudice.The Clerk of the Court shall send summons forms and a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 to the plaintiff. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/21/2021) (Attachments: #1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4) (ygl)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,4. Embossed raised seal. Tue Sep 21 15:01:03 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Sep 20 10:20:14 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gravaman Asset Management. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Gravaman Asset Management filed by Samuel Battle. (Filing fee $402.00; Receipt number DS133736) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Battle v. Gravaman Asset Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Battle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gravaman Asset Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
