Mathieu v. Babineaux et al
| James Mathieu |
| R Babineaux, Lauren Cox and Caleb Smith |
| 3:2021cv02223 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 11/15/2021) (mjr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ACCEPTING #8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 11/15/2021) (mjr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Mon Nov 15 12:31:39 CST 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Nov 15 13:46:46 CST 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #3 Complaint. The Court should dismiss Mathieu's case without prejudice under Rule 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/22/2021) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Oct 22 12:59:06 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 7 28 U.S.C. 2242 re: #3 Complaint filed by James Mathieu (ykp) |
| Filing 6 Seeking this Court for FRCP 57 via FRCP 56(a) filed by James Mathieu (ykp) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: James Mathieu must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a); the $402 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted; a request to proceed in forma pauperis must include a financial affidavit; civil rights pleadings are not filed on the appropriate form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10/21/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/21/2021) (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8, #3 Civil Rights Complaint) (ygl)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Sep 21 12:31:03 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Mon Sep 20 11:04:32 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Mathieu. (jmg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against R Babineaux, Lauren Cox, Caleb Smith filed by James Mathieu. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
