Byrum et al v. Intuitive Surgical Inc
| Sue Byrum and Curtis Byrum |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Inc |
| 3:2021cv02305 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Pers Inj/Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 2/25/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 2/25/2022. Discovery due by 10/28/2022. Joint Status Report due by 10/28/2022. Motions due by 12/2/2022. The court will set the case for trial by separate order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/10/2021) (ygl)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: No later than 14 days after this order is filed, plaintiff must comply with Rule 81.2, or must adopt another party's previously-filed certificate, so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/10/2021) (ygl)
|
| Filing 8 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order by Intuitive Surgical Inc. (Brinkman, Taylor) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Intuitive Surgical Inc. (Brinkman, Taylor) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Curtis Byrum. (Goetzmann, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Intuitive Surgical Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Brinkman, Taylor) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Scheduling Proposal Due Date is 11/2/2021. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/5/2021) (ctf)
|
| Filing 3 Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge A. Joe Fish recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:21-cv-2305-D. (ctf) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12256712) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Brinkman, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
