Sturns v. The Kroger Company et al
Marini Tazamisha Sturns |
The Kroger Company, Kroger Specialty Infusion and Ryan McGrath |
3:2021cv02307 |
September 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Sam A Lindsay |
Labor: Other Labor Litigation |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Marini Tazamisha Sturns. (Harman, Walker) |
Filing 11 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Marini Tazamisha Sturns. (Harman, Walker) |
Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND STATUS REPORT: Status Report due by 11/24/2021. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 10/25/2021) (svc) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kroger Specialty Infusion, Ryan McGrath, The Kroger Company. (Richter, Patrick) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Kroger Specialty Infusion, Ryan McGrath, The Kroger Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Patrick S Richter added to party Kroger Specialty Infusion(pty:dft), Attorney Patrick S Richter added to party Ryan McGrath(pty:dft), Attorney Patrick S Richter added to party The Kroger Company(pty:dft) (Richter, Patrick) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Kroger Company ; served on 10/4/2021. (ndt) (Main Document 7 replaced on 10/15/2021) (ndt). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ryan McGrath; served on 10/1/2021. (ndt) |
Filing 5 Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge A. Joe Fish recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Judge Sam A. Lindsay for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:21-cv-2307-L. (ctf) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kroger Specialty Infusion, Ryan McGrath, The Kroger Company. (mjr) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Marini Tazamisha Sturns. (Harman, Walker) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kroger Specialty Infusion, Ryan McGrath, The Kroger Company filed by Marini Tazamisha Sturns. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Harman, Walker) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.