Artis v. Quality Brand Group
| Erica Artis |
| Quality Brand Group |
| 3:2021cv02436 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER re: the plaintiff's 15 Memorandum in Support. To the extent that her filing may be liberally construed as another motion for reconsideration of the order to pay the filing fee, it is DENIED for the same reasons as her prior motions for reconsideration. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/1/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 12
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the application should be DENIED, and the case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/29/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF THE COURT ON #10 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. Considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma paupris of appeal [ECF No 6] is DENIED. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 11/15/2021) (mjr)
|
|
Filing 10
Recommendation Regarding Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Before the Court is the plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, which includes an Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and is liberally construed as a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, received on 10/25/2021 (doc. 6 ). The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/28/2021) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: the plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The plaintiff shall pay the required $402.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within 14 days from the date of this order. If she fails to do so, denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be recommended, and this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/6/2021) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Oct 6 09:56:29 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue Oct 5 12:57:17 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Erica Artis. (oyh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Quality Brand Group filed by Erica Artis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Artis v. Quality Brand Group | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erica Artis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Quality Brand Group | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
