Williams v. USA
Decorian Lamon Williams |
USA |
3:2021cv02450 |
October 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CASE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. United States Attorney shall within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Deadline to reply to the answer is thirty (30) days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 12/1/2021) (jmg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Dec 1 09:55:29 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 9 Memorandum in Support to #8 Second Amended Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 by Petitioner Decorian Lamon Williams. (jmg) Docket text modified on 12/1/2021 (twd). |
Filing 8 (Second) Amended MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:18-cr-099-N) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg) |
Filing 6 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Decorian Lamon Williams must address the following deficiency: Signature of the attorney of record or each party proceeding pro se is required on each pleading, motion or other paper filed by that party. Movant did not sign his amended 2255 motion. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/10/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/10/2021) (Attachments: #1 Amended 2255 Form) (ykp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Nov 10 10:15:52 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 7 Request for Copy of Documents by Decorian Lamon Williams with deputy clerk response. (mla) |
Filing 5 Amended MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:18-cr-99) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Court construes William's filing as a motion to vacate, set-aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. IT IS ORDERED that by 11/22/2021, Movant shall either withdraw his motion, or amend the motion using the enclosed form so that it contains all the claims he wishes to raise with respect to his conviction in Case No. 3:18-cr-00099-N-1. If Movant fails to set forth all the grounds in his 2255 motion, he may be barred from presenting additional grounds at a later date. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/8/2021) (Attachments: #1 Amended 2255) (mjr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Oct 8 16:33:15 CDT 2021 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Oct 6 14:28:16 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Decorian Lamon Williams. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mjr) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Decorian Lamon Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Leigha A Simonton-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.