General Scientific Corporation v. Quality Aspirators Inc
General Scientific Corporation doing business as SurgiTel |
Quality Aspirators Inc doing business as Q-Optics |
3:2021cv02530 |
October 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Property Rights: Patent |
28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER granting #28 Motion to Stay. It is further ordered that this action is stayed pending further order by the Court. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 11/12/2021) (ygl) |
Filing 29 Appendix in Support filed by Quality Aspirators Inc re #28 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Declaration of John M. Jackson, #2 Exhibit(s) A-1 - Order granting reexamination) (Jackson, John) |
Filing 28 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination filed by Quality Aspirators Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 27 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #23 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Scott D. Barnett. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/29/2021) (chmb) |
Filing 26 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #22 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of J. Michael Huget. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/29/2021) (chmb) |
Filing 25 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Quality Aspirators Inc. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Quality Aspirators Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - '235 Chart, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - '354 Chart) (Jackson, John) |
Filing 23 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12324007) filed by General Scientific Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Barnett, Scott) |
Filing 22 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12323469) filed by General Scientific Corporation (Huget, J. Michael) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael D Karson on behalf of General Scientific Corporation. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Karson, Michael) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher J Rourk on behalf of Quality Aspirators Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Rourk, Christopher) |
Filing 19 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position: (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/18/2021) (oyh) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John M Jackson on behalf of Quality Aspirators Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Jackson, John) |
Filing 17 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (ykp) |
Filing 16 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
Filing 15 Case electronically transferred in from District of Michigan Eastern; Case Number 2:20-cv-13244. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. Modified on 10/15/2021 (ykp). |
Filing 14 ORDER granting joint stipulation to transfer venue to the Northern District of Texas. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TTho) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue. Motion Hearing set for 11/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Gershwin A. Drain (TMcg) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Motion Hearing on 11/1/2021 is Cancelled re #13 Notice of Hearing on Motion (TMcg) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 12 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Quality Aspirators, Inc. d/b/a Q-Optics (Ney, Joshua) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue by Quality Aspirators, Inc. d/b/a Q-Optics. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Keith Wiley, #3 Exhibit Copy of House v. Gen. Elec. Co., #4 Exhibit Copy of Talsk Research Inc. v. Evernote Corp., #5 Exhibit Copy of Correct Transmission LLC v. ADTRAN, Inc., #6 Exhibit Copy of Patent Holder LLC v. Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc., #7 Exhibit Copy of CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Light Efficient Design) (Ney, Joshua) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to #1 Complaint for Patent Infringement Response due by 6/28/2021)***NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED*** Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to #1 Complaint for Patent Infringement (Response due by 6/13/2021) Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to #1 Complaint for Patent Infringement Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Quality Aspirators, Inc. d/b/a Q-Optics waiver sent on 1/13/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (Huget, J.) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford to District Judge Gershwin A. Drain and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Quality Aspirators, Inc. d/b/a Q-Optics* (LGra) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Douglas Barnett on behalf of General Scientific Corporation d/b/a SurgiTel. (Barnett, Scott) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 3 Patent Report Sent To Washington (Huget, J.) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by General Scientific Corporation d/b/a SurgiTel (Huget, J.) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement filed by General Scientific Corporation d/b/a SurgiTel against Quality Aspirators, Inc. d/b/a Q-Optics with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8212365 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, 2:19-cv-11181, Judge Gershwin A. Drain] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A. U.S. Patent '235, #3 Exhibit B. U.S. Patent '354, #4 Exhibit C. '235 Claim Chart) (Huget, J.) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/15/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: General Scientific Corporation v. Quality Aspirators Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: General Scientific Corporation doing business as SurgiTel | |
Represented By: | J Michael Huget |
Represented By: | Scott Douglas Barnett |
Represented By: | J. Michael Michael Huget |
Represented By: | Michael D Karson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Quality Aspirators Inc doing business as Q-Optics | |
Represented By: | Joshua E. Ney |
Represented By: | Christopher J Rourk |
Represented By: | John M Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.