SRE OpCo Inc et al v. Franklin Park SRE LLC
| SRE OpCo Inc, Sammons Renewable Energy Inc and Sammons Infrastructure Inc |
| Franklin Park SRE LLC |
| Sammons Energy |
| 3:2021cv02536 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by SRE OpCo Inc, Sammons Infrastructure Inc. Related document: Counterclaim (Loewinsohn, Alan) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SRE OpCo Inc, Sammons Infrastructure Inc. (Loewinsohn, Alan) |
| COUNTERCLAIM against Sammons Infrastructure Inc filed by Franklin Park SRE LLC (see document #6 for image). (axm) |
| Filing 6 (Document Restricted) Sealed Original Answer and Counterclaim filed by Franklin Park SRE LLC. (mjr) |
| Filing 4 (Document Restricted) Motion for Leave to File Answer and Counterclaim Under Seal (Sealed pursuant to motion to seal) filed by Franklin Park SRE LLC (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Proposed Order) (Fowler, Felicity) |
| Filing 3 (Document Restricted) Motion for Leave to File Answer and Counterclaim Under Seal (Sealed pursuant to motion to seal) filed by Franklin Park SRE LLC (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Proposed Order) (Fowler, Felicity) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Franklin Park SRE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12304895) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex. A - Original Petition, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. B - Declaration of T. Tribone, #3 Exhibit(s) Ex. C - Declaration of R. Venerus, #4 Exhibit(s) Ex. D - Declaraion of K. Lapidus, #5 Exhibit(s) Ex. E - Declaration of S. Lulla, #6 Exhibit(s) Ex. F - Index of State Court Action, #7 Exhibit(s) Ex. F-1 - Original Petition, #8 Exhibit(s) Ex. F-2 - St. Ct. Civil Action Info. Sheet, #9 Exhibit(s) Ex. F-3 - Citation, #10 Exhibit(s) Ex. F-4 - Return of Service (Executed), #11 Exhibit(s) Ex. G - FP Cert. of Int. Parties, #12 Exhibit(s) Ex. H - St. Ct. Docket Sheet, #13 Cover Sheet, #14 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Fowler, Felicity) (Attachment 13 and 14 replaced with flattened PDF on 10/15/2021) (ygl). |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Franklin Park SRE LLC. (See document #1 -11 for image). (ygl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
