James v. Strong et al
Ronnie James |
Daniel Strong and FirstFleet Inc |
3:2021cv02555 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Barbara M G Lynn |
Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Remand to State Court. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 11/19/2021) (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (ndt) |
Filing 9 Supplement to #8 Agree Motion to Remand filed by Ronnie James. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) BINDING STIPULATION OF PLAINTIFFS DAMAGES AND AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY) (Townend, David) Modified text on 11/19/2021 (mjr). |
Filing 8 Agreed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ronnie James (Townend, David) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for three-week docket beginning 12/12/2022 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. Joinder of Parties due by 7/13/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 3/31/2022. Motions due by 9/5/2022. Discovery due by 3/31/2022. Settlement Status Report due by 3/31/2022. Pretrial Order due by 11/21/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 11/21/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 12/9/2022 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 11/10/2021) (ygl) |
Filing 6 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order /Case Management Plan by FirstFleet Inc, Daniel Strong. (Scudder, Mark) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/9/2021. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 10/19/2021) (oyh) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Oct 19 10:40:15 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Defendant FirstFleet's Written Consent to Defendant Daniel Strong's Notice of Removal filed by FirstFleet Inc (Scudder, Mark) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Daniel Strong. (Scudder, Mark) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Daniel Strong. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12309623) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) B1, #4 Exhibit(s) B2, #5 Exhibit(s) B3, #6 Exhibit(s) B4, #7 Exhibit(s) B5, #8 Exhibit(s) B6, #9 Exhibit(s) B7, #10 Exhibit(s) B8, #11 Exhibit(s) B9, #12 Exhibit(s) B10, #13 Exhibit(s) C, #14 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Scudder, Mark) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Mon Oct 18 16:20:37 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.