James v. Strong et al
Plaintiff: Ronnie James
Defendant: Daniel Strong and FirstFleet Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv02555
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Defendant FirstFleet's Written Consent to Defendant Daniel Strong's Notice of Removal filed by FirstFleet Inc (Scudder, Mark)
October 18, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Daniel Strong. (Scudder, Mark)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl)
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Daniel Strong. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12309623) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) B1, #4 Exhibit(s) B2, #5 Exhibit(s) B3, #6 Exhibit(s) B4, #7 Exhibit(s) B5, #8 Exhibit(s) B6, #9 Exhibit(s) B7, #10 Exhibit(s) B8, #11 Exhibit(s) B9, #12 Exhibit(s) B10, #13 Exhibit(s) C, #14 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Scudder, Mark)
October 18, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Mon Oct 18 16:20:37 CDT 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Strong et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnie James
Represented By: Joshua William Alexander
Represented By: David W Townend
Represented By: Kelsey Brodock
Represented By: Robert Brandon Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Strong
Represented By: Mark S Scudder
Represented By: Andrew Dalton Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FirstFleet Inc
Represented By: Mark S Scudder
Represented By: Andrew Dalton Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?