Doyle v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Lauren Doyle
Defendant: John Doe and CSC Serviceworks Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv02615
Filed: October 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint filed by CSC Serviceworks Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (McLain, Matthew)
November 19, 2021 Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Lauren Doyle. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Scheumack, Griffin) Modified text on 11/22/2021 (ygl).
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Reopen Case. It is therefore ORDERED that this case is REOPENED. Although the plaintiff filed a certificate of interested persons (docket entry 9) without leave of court, it is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's certificate of interested persons is deemed filed. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/19/2021) (ykp)
November 19, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lauren Doyle. (Scheumack, Griffin)
November 19, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION REINSTATE CASE ON COURT'S DOCKET filed by Lauren Doyle (Scheumack, Griffin)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 22, 2021, the plaintiff was ordered to file a certificate of interested persons satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) by November 12, 2021 (docket entry 3) but has failed to do so. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Rule 16(f)(1)(C), F.R. Civ. P. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/15/2021) (chmb)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 23, 2021, the court ordered attorney Amanda French, who is not a member of the Bar of the Northern District of Texas, to either (1) provide to the court, and to the clerk of court, satisfactory documentation of membership or (2) apply for membership in the Bar of this court or for admission pro hac vice for this case no later than November 12, 2021 (docket entry 4). There having been no compliance with that order, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney Amanda French is terminated as a counsel for the plaintiff and shall have no further participation in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/15/2021) (chmb)
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 Motion to Withdraw and for Substitution of Attorney in Charge filed by Lauren Doyle. (Scheumack, Griffin) Modified event and text on 11/16/2021 (mjr).
November 15, 2021 Civil case terminated. (chmb)
October 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Amanda French ("counsel"), whose name appears on a pleading in this case, is not a member of the Bar of the Northern District of Texas. Accordingly, no later than November 12, 2021, counsel shall either (1) provide to the court, and to the clerk of court, satisfactory documentation of membership* or (2) apply for membership in the Bar of this court or for admission pro hac vice for this case. (*A letter stating the date of counsel's admission to the Bar of this court is satisfactory documentation.) (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/23/2021) (chmb)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On October 21, 2021, the defendant removed this civil action to this court. Local Rule 81.2 provides that "[w]ithin 21 days after the notice of removal is filed, the plaintiff shall file a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e). If the plaintiff concurs in the accuracy of another party's previously-filed certificate, the plaintiff may adopt that certificate." LR 3.1(c) and 3.2(e) in turn require that when a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with "a separately signed certificate of interested persons -- in a form approved by the clerk -- that contains -- in addition to the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a) -- a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary." Accordingly, no later than November 12, 2021, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/22/2021) (chmb)
October 21, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh)
October 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by CSC Serviceworks, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12322026) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (McLain, Matthew)
October 21, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Thu Oct 21 16:44:03 CDT 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doyle v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Doyle
Represented By: Amanda French
Represented By: Griffin Jay Scheumack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSC Serviceworks Inc
Represented By: Mahan Vera Wright
Represented By: Matthew T McLain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?