Morales-Sanchez v. USA
| Roman Morales-Sanchez |
| USA |
| 3:2021cv02741 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Morales-Sanchezs Motion for Hardship Credit for Hard Time Served is DENIED and, construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing a proper petition under 2241 after exhausting applicable administrative remedies. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to open for statistical purposes a new habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. 2241, directly assign it to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this criminal case, and to close the same on the basis of this order. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to mail Morales-Sanchez a copy of this Court's standard forms for filing a civil complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis in case he wishes to file a new civil action. Morales-Sanchez is cautioned that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA will apply to the new action. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/4/2021) (Attachments: #1 Standard Form, #2 IFP) (jmg)
|
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Thu Nov 4 15:06:39 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Hardship Credit for Hard Time Served - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Roman Morales-Sanchez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Docketed in Criminal Case 3:18-cr-232-K as Doc. No. 653.) (jmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morales-Sanchez v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roman Morales-Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
