Coulter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Veneisha Coulter |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv02776 |
| November 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE AND CERTAIN PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS: Amended Pleadings due by 2/28/2022. Discovery due by 10/28/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 2/28/2022. Motions due by 10/3/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 4/21/2023. Pretrial Order due by 4/21/2023. This case is set for trial on this court's four-week docket beginning 5/1/2023 before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. Pretrial Conference set for 4/28/2023 10:30 AM before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/29/2021) (ndt)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Veneisha Coulter. (Martinez, Nathanial) |
|
Filing 10
STATUS REPORT ORDER: The report shall be ELECTRONICALLY FILED no later than 12/28/2021. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/7/2021) (ykp)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Julie Ann Farmer on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Farmer, Julie) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Wallace, Tracey) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER: On December 3, 2021, the defendant filed an answer in this case but did not provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 7.4 requires that "[t]he initial responsive pleading or motion filed in lieu of a responsive pleading that a defendant files in a civil action must be accompanied by a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR3.1(c) or 3.2(e). If the defendant concurs in the accuracy of another party's previously-filed certificate, the defendant may adopt that certificate." Accordingly, by December 13, 2021, the defendant must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/3/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Tracey R Wallace added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Wallace, Tracey) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; served on 11/12/2021. (jmg) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (mjr) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Veneisha Coulter. (Martinez, Nathanial) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed by Veneisha Coulter. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12373107) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B) (Martinez, Nathanial) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coulter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Veneisha Coulter | |
| Represented By: | Nathanial L Martinez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tracey R Wallace |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Farmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
