Miller v. Rosenbaum
| John Williams Miller |
| Robin S Rosenbaum |
| 3:2021cv02852 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION and MOTION hearing for Magistrate Judge Toliver to Recuse Immediately from Case filed by John Williams Miller re: #5 Order Transferring to Another District. (ygl) |
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Northern District of Georgia as case number 1:21-cv-04918. (jmg) |
Filing 5
ORDER: It is ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division for further proceedings. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/30/2021) (jmg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Nov 30 16:53:36 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. (jmg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Tue Nov 16 14:23:03 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Robin S Rosenbaum. (mla) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Robin S Rosenbaum filed by John Williams Miller. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number DS134876) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mla) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. Rosenbaum | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Williams Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robin S Rosenbaum | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
