Manfredini v. Quick Technologies Inc et al
Plaintiff: Jansen Manfredini
Defendant: Quick Technologies Inc doing business as Sage, Eric Natinsky, David Natinsky and Bille Forman
Case Number: 3:2021cv02886
Filed: November 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Finding the existence of an agreement to arbitrate with a valid delegation clause, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion in part; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants should be submitted to arbitration. Doc. No. 26. Because there are open arbitrability questions left for the arbitrator, however, the Court STAYS this proceeding pending the arbitration per 9 U.S.C. 3. The parties are ORDERED to inform the Court within fourteen (14) days of the completion of the arbitration or settlement.There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as open for statistical purposes. The clerk is therefore instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/3/2023) (chmb)
November 7, 2022 Filing 34 Supplemental Brief in Opposition of #28 Response/Objection to Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss filed by Jansen Manfredini Modified text on 11/9/2022 (svc).
October 31, 2022 Filing 33 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Bille Forman, David Natinsky, Eric Natinsky, Quick Technologies Inc re #26 Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Merritt, Laura) Modified docket text and linkage on 11/1/2022 (oyh).
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: Defendants should submit their supplemental briefing by October 31, 2022. Plaintiff may respond to Defendants' supplemental brief within seven (7) days of its filing. Neither brief shall exceed ten (10) pages in length. No reply brief is permitted absent further order of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/24/2022) (chmb)
April 14, 2022 Filing 31 REPLY filed by Quick Technologies Inc re: #26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Merritt, Laura)
March 31, 2022 Filing 30 Appendix in Support filed by Jansen Manfredini re #29 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified linkage and text on 4/1/2022 (mjr).
March 31, 2022 Filing 29 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jansen Manfredini re: #28 Response/Objection. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified linkage and text on 4/1/2022 (mjr).
March 31, 2022 Filing 28 RESPONSE filed by Jansen Manfredini re: #26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Narvaez, Monica)
March 10, 2022 Filing 27 Appendix in Support filed by Quick Technologies Inc re #26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Merritt, Laura)
March 10, 2022 Filing 26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration filed by Quick Technologies Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Merritt, Laura)
February 25, 2022 Filing 25 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Bille Forman, David Natinsky, Eric Natinsky, Quick Technologies Inc filed by Jansen Manfredini. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mjr)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ELECTRONIC ORDER - Before the Court are Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (the "Motion") (Doc. No. 12), Defendants' Response Brief Opposing Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (the "Response") (Doc. No. 18), and Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, and Brief in Support (the "Reply") (Doc. No. 22). After careful consideration of the Motion, the Response, the Reply, the associated briefs, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)'s broad mandate that the Court grant leave "when justice so requires," the Court GRANTS the Motion. Therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration and Brief in Support (Doc. No. 5) and Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Doc. No. 20) are both DENIED as moot without prejudice to refiling. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/25/2022) (chmb)
February 22, 2022 Filing 23 Appendix in Support filed by Jansen Manfredini re #22 Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Narvaez, Monica)
February 22, 2022 Filing 22 REPLY filed by Jansen Manfredini re: #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Complaint (Narvaez, Monica)
February 15, 2022 Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by Quick Technologies Inc re: #20 MOTION for Hearing re #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Complaint, #18 Response/Objection, #15 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration, #14 Response/Objection, [17 (Merritt, Laura)
February 14, 2022 Filing 20 MOTION for Oral Argument re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration filed by Jansen Manfredini. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified linkage and text on 2/15/2022 (mjr).
February 7, 2022 Filing 19 Appendix in Support filed by Quick Technologies Inc re #18 Response/Objection Appendix (Merritt, Laura)
February 7, 2022 Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Quick Technologies Inc re: #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Complaint (Merritt, Laura)
February 1, 2022 Filing 17 REPLY filed by Bille Forman, David Natinsky, Eric Natinsky, Quick Technologies Inc re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Hammel, William)
January 18, 2022 Filing 16 Appendix in Support filed by Jansen Manfredini re #15 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified text and linkage on 1/19/2022 (jmg).
January 18, 2022 Filing 15 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jansen Manfredini #14 Response/Objection. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified text and linkage on 1/19/2022 (jmg).
January 18, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Jansen Manfredini re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration (Narvaez, Monica)
January 18, 2022 Filing 13 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #12 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff Jansen Manfredini. (Narvaez, Monica)
January 18, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Jansen Manfredini with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amendment) (Narvaez, Monica)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration. Responses due by 1/17/2022. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/6/2022) (chmb)
January 6, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration filed by Jansen Manfredini. (Narvaez, Monica) Modified text and linkage on 1/7/2022 (jmg).
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration. Responses due by 1/10/2022. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/9/2021) (chmb)
December 9, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration filed by Jansen Manfredini (Narvaez, Monica)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Steven H. Garrett. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/6/2021) (chmb)
December 3, 2021 Filing 6 Appendix in Support filed by Quick Technologies Inc re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration Appendix (Merritt, Laura) Modified text on 12/6/2021 (ygl).
December 3, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Refer to Arbitration filed by Quick Technologies Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Merritt, Laura)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12431004) filed by Quick Technologies Inc (Garrett, Steven) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2021: #1 Additional Page(s) PHV with Signature and Certificate of Good Standing from Texas State Bar) (chmb). (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/6/2021) (ygl).
November 17, 2021 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla)
November 17, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bille Forman, David Natinsky, Eric Natinsky, Quick Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Sage. (Merritt, Laura)
November 17, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Bille Forman, Eric Natinsky, David Natinsky, Quick Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Sage. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12393029) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Additional Page(s) Index, #4 Additional Page(s) Docket, #5 Additional Page(s) State Court Filings) (Merritt, Laura)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manfredini v. Quick Technologies Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jansen Manfredini
Represented By: Michael Y Kim
Represented By: Ericha Ramsey Brown
Represented By: Monica Lynn Narvaez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quick Technologies Inc doing business as Sage
Represented By: Laura M Merritt
Represented By: Steven H Garrett
Represented By: William E Hammel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Natinsky
Represented By: Laura M Merritt
Represented By: Steven H Garrett
Represented By: William E Hammel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Natinsky
Represented By: Laura M Merritt
Represented By: Steven H Garrett
Represented By: William E Hammel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bille Forman
Represented By: Laura M Merritt
Represented By: Steven H Garrett
Represented By: William E Hammel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?