Hartsfield Cabinet LLC v. The Phoenix Insurance Company
| Hartsfield Cabinet LLC |
| The Phoenix Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv02953 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The Phoenix Insurance Company filed by Hartsfield Cabinet LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Doyle, James) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial beginning 10/17/2022 before Judge Jane J. Boyle. Joinder of Parties due by 3/1/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 3/1/2022. Motions due by 7/1/2022. Discovery due by 6/1/2022. Deadline for mediation is on or before 6/10/2022. Pretrial Order due by 10/3/2022. Pretrial Materials due by 10/3/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 10/14/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J. Boyle. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/4/2022) (svc)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. (Edwards, Christine) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christine R Edwards for Steven T. Ramos on behalf of The Phoenix Insurance Company. (Edwards, Christine) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Edwards, Christine) Modified title on 12/14/2021 (ygl). |
|
Filing 6
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 1/3/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 12/10/2021) (svc)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave from Local Counsel Requirement. Defendant is expected to comply with Local Rule 83.10. Defendant must file a designation of local counsel within fourteen days. See L.R. 83.10(a). (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 12/10/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION Motion for Leave to Appear Without Local Counsel filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company (Edwards, Christine) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (NOTICE OF REMOVAL) filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Edwards, Christine) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12410354) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s) l, #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Cover Sheet, #7 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Edwards, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hartsfield Cabinet LLC v. The Phoenix Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hartsfield Cabinet LLC | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph Doyle, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Phoenix Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Christine R Edwards |
| Represented By: | Steven T Ramos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
