Parrales v. Aditya et al
Stephanie Parrales |
Mahesh Aditya and Santander Consumer USA |
3:2021cv02974 |
November 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Torts/Pers Prop: Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Jan 18 09:35:38 CST 2022 (crt) |
Filing 11 ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Mahesh Aditya and Santander Consumer USA's Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (ECF No. #7 ), filed on December 16, 2021. Accordingly, Parrales is ORDERED to show cause in writing as to why her Response and Amended Complaint should not be struck as untimely. Parrales must file a written response to this Order explaining her failure to timely respond to Defendants' Motion and timely amend her complaint within 10 days of service of this Order. Parrales may include any request for leave to file her amended complaint under Rule 15(a)(2) in her written response to this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/14/2022) (ndt) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA filed by Stephanie Parrales. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Stephanie Parrales re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1). (oyh) |
Filing 8 Appendix in Support filed by Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) (Martinelli, Brent) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) filed by Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Brent William Martinelli added to party Mahesh Aditya(pty:dft), Attorney Brent William Martinelli added to party Santander Consumer USA(pty:dft) (Martinelli, Brent) |
Filing 6 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Stephanie Parrales must address the following deficiency: The $402 filing fee has not been paid. On November 29, 2021, the Court received a $400 check from Plaintiff, a partial filing fee, and it was returned to Plaintiff. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/30/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/30/2021) (ykp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Nov 30 08:43:54 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Stephanie Parrales. (axm) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stephanie Parrales. (axm) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA filed by Stephanie Parrales. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Nov 29 13:46:53 CST 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.