Parrales v. Aditya et al
Plaintiff: Stephanie Parrales
Defendant: Mahesh Aditya and Santander Consumer USA
Case Number: 3:2021cv02974
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Prop: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Jan 18 09:35:38 CST 2022 (crt)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Mahesh Aditya and Santander Consumer USA's Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (ECF No. #7 ), filed on December 16, 2021. Accordingly, Parrales is ORDERED to show cause in writing as to why her Response and Amended Complaint should not be struck as untimely. Parrales must file a written response to this Order explaining her failure to timely respond to Defendants' Motion and timely amend her complaint within 10 days of service of this Order. Parrales may include any request for leave to file her amended complaint under Rule 15(a)(2) in her written response to this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/14/2022) (ndt)
January 13, 2022 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA filed by Stephanie Parrales. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh)
January 13, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Stephanie Parrales re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1). (oyh)
December 16, 2021 Filing 8 Appendix in Support filed by Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) (Martinelli, Brent)
December 16, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) filed by Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Brent William Martinelli added to party Mahesh Aditya(pty:dft), Attorney Brent William Martinelli added to party Santander Consumer USA(pty:dft) (Martinelli, Brent)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Stephanie Parrales must address the following deficiency: The $402 filing fee has not been paid. On November 29, 2021, the Court received a $400 check from Plaintiff, a partial filing fee, and it was returned to Plaintiff. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/30/2021. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/30/2021) (ykp)
November 30, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Nov 30 08:43:54 CST 2021 (crt)
November 29, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Stephanie Parrales. (axm)
November 29, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stephanie Parrales. (axm)
November 29, 2021 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer USA filed by Stephanie Parrales. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm)
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm)
November 29, 2021 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm)
November 29, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Nov 29 13:46:53 CST 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parrales v. Aditya et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Parrales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mahesh Aditya
Represented By: Brent William Martinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santander Consumer USA
Represented By: Brent William Martinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?