Harris v. United Payment Center Inc
| Trenton Harris |
| United Payment Center Inc |
| 3:2022cv00010 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: The parties have announced that this case has been resolved. Any trial setting and scheduling order are vacated. The parties have sixty days to file dismissal papers. If the parties do not file dismissal papers within sixty days, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/4/2022) (jmg)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Trenton Harris (Parr, James) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United Payment Center Inc; served on 1/11/2022. (Parr, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dena L Mathis for James J. Parr on behalf of Trenton Harris. (Mathis, Dena) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United Payment Center Inc. (mjr) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trenton Harris. (Parr, James) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by TRENTON HARRIS. (Parr, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED PAYMENT CENTER INC. filed by TRENTON HARRIS. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12493195) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Parr, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. United Payment Center Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trenton Harris | |
| Represented By: | James Joshua Parr |
| Represented By: | Dena L Mathis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Payment Center Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
