Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
| Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd, Marilyn Byrd, Eddie Byrd, Luvinia Robinson, Debbie Byrd Jackson, Leola Byrd Redmond and Donnell Porter |
| The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief, Joan Vance, Sandy Leed, Richard D Reed, Skyr Gerald, Jane/John Doe 1 #3:22-cv-70, Jane/John Doe 2 #3:22-cv-70, Jane/John Doe 3 #3:22-cv-70, Keith Jalman, Jack Hampton, Joe Kendal, Jane/John Doe 4 #3:22-cv-70, Bryan Collier and Bruce Antow |
| 3:2022cv00070 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER terminating #9 Motion to Dismiss the Indictment ; terminating #10 Motion for Direct Verdict of Acquittal. As previously noted in this case, the pro se prisoner plaintiff has been sanctioned for frivolous filings by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) as well as district courts in this circuit. Any future motions filed in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated. No action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the sanctions order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/9/2022) (ykp)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Wed Mar 9 09:42:49 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 11 Proof Of Service by Alfred Lee Stone re #10 MOTION for Direct Verdict of Acquittal, #9 MOTION to Dismiss the Indictment. (oyh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Direct Verdict of Acquittal filed by Alfred Lee Stone. (oyh) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the Indictment filed by Alfred Lee Stone. (oyh) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #6 , #7 Motion for Permission to File a Civil Rights Complaint. Any future motions filed in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated. No action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the sanctions order and this order. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to forward copies of this order to the plaintiff. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 2/28/2022) (ndt)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Feb 28 09:07:03 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Permission to File a Civil Rights Complaint filed by Alfred Lee Stone. (mla) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Permission to File a Civil Rights Complaint filed by Alfred Lee Stone. (mla) |
|
Filing 5
The pro se prisoner plaintiff has previously been sanctioned for frivolous filings by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) as well as district courts in this circuit. The Clerk's Office shall file a copy of the attached sanctions order from the Southern District of Texas in this case and shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE it for failure to comply with the order's terms. The motion for leave to proceed with yet another frivolous lawsuit in forma pauperis is DEEMED MOOT. Any future motions filed in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated. No action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the sanctions order and this order. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to forward copies of this order and the sanctions order from the Southern District of Texas to the plaintiff. (ykp). #1 Exhibit(s) H-00-1496 from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division) (ykp). Modified on 1/14/2022 (ykp).(Main Document 5 replaced on 1/14/2022) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/14/2022)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Jan 14 12:49:43 CST 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Jan 12 15:45:04 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Alfred Lee Stone. (oyh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Jim Bowles, Bryan Collier, Jane/John Doe 1 #3:22-cv-70, Jane/John Doe 2 #3:22-cv-70, Jane/John Doe 3 #3:22-cv-70, Jane/John Doe 4 #3:22-cv-70, Skyr Gerald, Jack Hampton, Keith Jalman, Joe Kendal, Sandy Leed, Police Chief, Richard D Reed, The City of Dallas County Texas, Joan Vance filed by Alfred Lee Stone. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
