Khatiwada v. Deboskie
Plaintiff: Aayush Khatiwada and Paper Work Party
Defendant: Gregory Lynn Deboskie and RatchetTv The Hood Jornalist
Case Number: 3:2022cv00079
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2022 Filing 12 Report to Copyright Office of Final Order. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (mla)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/9/2022) (mla)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ACCEPTING #9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/9/2022) (mla)
March 9, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10, 11. Wed Mar 9 13:31:49 CST 2022 (crt)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #3 Complaint. The Court should dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 2/17/2022) (oyh)
February 17, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Feb 17 16:22:28 CST 2022 (crt)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Aayush Khatiwada must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The pleadings are not filed on the appropriate form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 2/14/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/14/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Rule 8, #2 Additional Page(s) Complaint) (ndt)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/14/2022) (mla)
January 14, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Jan 14 10:29:40 CST 2022 (crt)
January 14, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Jan 14 10:02:17 CST 2022 (crt)
January 13, 2022 Filing 6 Report to Copyright Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aayush Khatiwada. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Aayush Khatiwada. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Gregory Lynn Deboskie filed by Aayush Khatiwada. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)
January 13, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Jan 13 15:31:54 CST 2022 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khatiwada v. Deboskie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aayush Khatiwada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paper Work Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Lynn Deboskie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RatchetTv The Hood Jornalist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?